Re: Status of IPA patch?

[Juri Linkov]

>  > The omission of those two was intentional, since U+20A7 is equivalent to tʃ
>  > (note that that digraph doesn’t include the tie that would be necessary to
>  > have it as a phoneme distinct from /t/ followed by /ʃ/) and g is equivalent
>  > to U+0261 for the purposes of the IPA.

I don’t understand why do you omit U+20A7 and U+0261 if they exist in
X-SAMPA and Kirshenbaum?

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/