[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: have cake will eat, eat cake will have - krazy key koncept kontrover
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: have cake will eat, eat cake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:31:39 +0900 |
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:
>> 11. WDOT? Is this a good idea in general or not? If so, do you have
>> a good idea for an implementation of #9?
>
> Cua-mode uses a short delay (`cua-prefix-override-inhibit-delay') to decide
> between interpreting a key as a prefix key or using its own binding.
Note that this sort of test is notoriously flaky, and should only be
used if there's no other choice. It's far, far, better, to simply avoid
the ambiguity in the first place.
-miles
--
History, n. An account mostly false, of events mostly unimportant, which are
brought about by rulers mostly knaves, and soldiers mostly fools.
- have cake will eat, eat cake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Drew Adams, 2009/08/26
- Re: have cake will eat, eat cake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Andrey Paramonov, 2009/08/27
- RE: have cake will eat, eatcake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Drew Adams, 2009/08/27
- Re: have cake will eat, eatcake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Андрей Парамонов, 2009/08/28
- Re: have cake will eat, eatcake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/28
- Re: have cake will eat, eatcake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Андрей Парамонов, 2009/08/29
- Re: have cake will eat, eatcake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Andreas Schwab, 2009/08/28
- RE: have cake will eat, eatcake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Drew Adams, 2009/08/28
Re: have cake will eat, eat cake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy, Juri Linkov, 2009/08/27
- Re: have cake will eat, eat cake will have - krazy key koncept kontroversy,
Miles Bader <=