Re: Status of IPA patch?

[Juri Linkov]

>  > >  > (Is there any other major software to be compatible with?)
>  > >
>  > > Well, SCIM, but that’s not really major. My friend Clint, here:
>  > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=499558 preferred the
>  > > script G when he adapted the Kirshenbaum method to SCIM, and didn’t
>  > > offere a choice; if anyone has an SCIM install, I’d be curious as to
>  > > what that does with its X-SAMPA input.
>  >
>  > Both X-SAMPA and Kirshenbaum SCIM inputs use U+0261 for `g'.
>  >
>  > IPA-X-SAMPA:
>  > g  ɡ       0       # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G
>  >
>  > IPA-Kirshenbaum:
>  > g  ɡ       0       # U+0261 LATIN SMALL LETTER SCRIPT G
>  >
>  > I see no reason to deviate from this standard in Emacs.
>
> SCIM is a standard? Interesting perspective.

SCIM follows the standard, so there is no reason for Emacs
not to do the same.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/