[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: obsolete selective-display ?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: obsolete selective-display ? |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:50:52 +0900 |
Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> > > Is it time for selective-display be declared obsolete?
> >
> > What are the alternatives?
>
> 'invisible property on overlays
It's not entirely clear that's a good replacement, since using invisible
properties requires annotating the buffer and keeping those annotations
up-to-date (and of course, overlays can become _very_ expensive if there
are a lot of them).
My impression is that selective-display is slightly hard to use in some
cases -- the whole "hide everything following ^M is downright weird,
though the "hide more than N columns of indentation" behavior seems
straightforward enough -- but its very low cost is appealing.
-Miles
--
Liberty, n. One of imagination's most precious possessions.
- obsolete selective-display ?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/29
- Re: obsolete selective-display ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/29
- Re: obsolete selective-display ?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/29
- Re: obsolete selective-display ?,
Miles Bader <=
- Replace selective-display in Gnus (was: obsolete selective-display ?), Reiner Steib, 2009/08/29
- Re: Replace selective-display in Gnus, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/29
- Re: Replace selective-display in Gnus, Reiner Steib, 2009/08/29
- Re: Replace selective-display in Gnus, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/08/29