[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose? |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:59:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Glenn Morris <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> A make that removed old .elc files and did bootstrap when needed is
>>>> the ideal solution. The second part is probably very hard.
>>>
>>> What we need IMO is a way to scan all the *.el files, look for
>>> `require', and generate Make dependencies between Lisp files. Then
>>> this problem should be gone for good.
>
> Or we could just ask Stefan to install the patch he has to prefer .el
> files while building:
>
> http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2061#92
>
> The level of hyperbole in the OP and the subject is rather extreme.
> Always run `make bootstrap' if you don't want to deal with these issues.
>
> Automated build testing is no use, since it cannot come round to your
> house and type `make bootstrap' for you.
Would it not be possible to have 2 sets of automated build tests? One
that tests a clean checkout, and one that shows the latest state of an
incremental build? I think automated build tests would be useful even
without testing incremental builds.
>
--
Joakim Verona
- RE: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, (continued)
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/07
- RE: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Drew Adams, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07
- more reliable `make', Glenn Morris, 2009/09/07
- Re: more reliable `make', Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
- Re: more reliable `make', Glenn Morris, 2009/09/10
- Re: more reliable `make', Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/10
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?,
joakim <=
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, joakim, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Alan Mackenzie, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. A workaround., Alan Mackenzie, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. A workaround., Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/08
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/07
- Re: build broken: no defun org-float-time. Who's guilty, and what does he propose?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/07