[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET merge question
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET merge question |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:11:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> I have a question about CEDET that hopefully someone on this list, who
> has more experience using CEDET than me, can help answer (I've been
> corresponding with Eric Ludlam, but he's gone on vacation).
>
> The Semantic parser appears to have two major "back-ends", bovine and
> wisent, which are used to generate Semantic tags. Does anyone know how
> crucial these packages are, and whether one or the other (or both) be
> dropped or somehow trimmed down?
>
> I ask because the CEDET merge already involves an uncomfortably large
> amount of code, and it's rather dismaying to see these two big code
> trees "embedded" in subdirectories of Semantic. (Wisent, for instance,
> appears to be an entire Elisp reimplementation of Bison...)
>
Emacs hackers would still need easy access to these tools. Maybe this is
a further case for including something like Tom Tromeys ELPA in Emacs?
If we had something like that by default it wouldnt be a big deal to
distribute tools like these to Emacs hackers.
>
> (The CVS branch I'm using for the CEDET merge is not yet suitable for
> general testing; I'll inform the list when it's ready.)
>
--
Joakim Verona
- Re: CEDET merge question, (continued)
- Re: CEDET merge question, David Engster, 2009/09/12
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/14
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/13
- Re: CEDET merge question, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/07
Re: CEDET merge question,
joakim <=