[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gnus and No Gnus
From: |
Steinar Bang |
Subject: |
Re: Gnus and No Gnus |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:10:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> Teemu Likonen <address@hidden>:
> On 2009-09-08 11:15 (+0900), Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>> Polls of corporate Emacs users (the last one I've seen was about
>> October 2007) showed that about 1% use Emacs 18, about 10% use Emacs
>> 19 or Lucid 19, about 20% using Emacs 20 or XEmacs 20. I forget what
>> current Emacs was at that time, but by extrapolating I suspect there
>> are indeed a lot of people still using Emacs 21 out there today.
> Yes, Emacs 21 is still used. This is what Debian popularity contest
> graph shows:
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon-graph.php?packages=emacs22-bin-common%2Cemacs23-bin-common%2Cemacs21-bin-common%2Cxemacs21-mule&show_vote=on&want_legend=on&from_date=&to_date=&hlght_date=&date_fmt=%25Y-%25m&beenhere=1
> Debian Sid (the unstable development branch) does not have Emacs 21
> anymore so I guess it will be dropped from next Debian release.
Emacs 21 is the default emacs installed on RHEL4 machines, and there are
quite a few of them around, and they will probably be around for quite a
while.
Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/09/08
- Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/08
- Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/09/08
- Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/08
- Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/09/08
- Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2009/09/09
Re: Gnus and No Gnus, Steinar Bang, 2009/09/15