[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bazaar
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Bazaar |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:04:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Would it make much of a difference if we omit some of those old CVS
>> branches from the conversion (if that's even possible)? I presume no
>> one is going to go rooting around the "amigados-merge" branch from 1996.
No it would make almost no difference.
> This is not a branch, but a tag. A properly converted repository would
> only have 40 branches.
We can and should move the bzr branches that do not correspond to a CVS
branch to a subdirectory, so as to clean up the name space. But this
repository is just for testing, so there's no point wasting time on this
(tho feel free to try it, so to get a feel for how it would work).
>> Even things like the rmail-mbox branch and the emacs-unicode branch
>> could probably be discarded.
> I don't agree. We should not carelessly discard history.
Agreed, unless there's a good reason for it.
Saving a tiny portion of a large disk space doesn't seem like
a good reason.
Stefan
- Bazaar, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/15
- Re: Bazaar, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/17
- Re: Bazaar, Chong Yidong, 2009/09/17
- Re: Bazaar, Chong Yidong, 2009/09/17
- Message not available
- Re: Bazaar, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/18
- Re: Bazaar, Glenn Morris, 2009/09/18