[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CEDET merge
From: |
Ulrich Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: CEDET merge |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:42:27 +0200 |
>>>>> On Mon, 28 Sep 2009, Chong Yidong wrote:
>> Was this renaming of files really necessary? It breaks backwards
>> compatibility and imposes additional work on package authors and
>> distros.
> No one suggested any other solution to the filename problem.
The obvious solution is not to support CEDET on platforms with 8+3
filenames ...
> Maybe we could get around this by adding a `cedet-compat' package
> that loads everything everything in CEDET and provides all the old
> CEDET feature names; then loading this file will provide everything
> a third-party package needs to compile.
Not sure if loading everything at once is a good idea. CEDET is huge.
But couldn't at least the old feature names be provided by the single
files? (As it was done for newsticker-*, for example.)
Ulrich
Re: CEDET merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/28
Re: CEDET merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/09/28
Re: CEDET merge, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/28