[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Package Management
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Package Management |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:39:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan> You mean that it "does" all those steps, right?
Stefan> Not that it "distinguishes" them, right? IOW, it collapses "activate"
Stefan> and "make available" into a single entity.
> Yeah, sorry about that.
> The reason it is this way is just that I thought the UI was better.
> Few people have asked for a separate "deactivated" state.
> Naturally, it is implementable. I still think the default on
> installation should be to activate; requiring two steps seems
> user-unfriendly.
Yes, I agree on the UI front. But I think it's important to let the
user have more control, when she needs it. So the default will be to
auto-activate.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs Package Management, (continued)
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/09/17
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Lennart Borgman, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Chong Yidong, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Phil Hagelberg, 2009/09/28
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Richard Stallman, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Stefan Monnier, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/29
- Re: Emacs Package Management,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs Package Management, Tom Tromey, 2009/09/30