[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nterm a vt100 emulator
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: nterm a vt100 emulator |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:49:46 -0700 (PDT) |
Ivan Kanis <address@hidden> writes:
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >> term and terminal are not meant to be full emulation. term has
> >> a pager and line mode which nterm doesn't do. nterm doesn't track
> >> current directory like term does.
> >
> > That makes it sound like nterm is like term but with less features.
> > I'm sure there's an upside to it. Also, if you could explain how these
> > different design decisions affect the ability to fix the original cursor
> > bug, that would be great.
>
> The recorder takes a trace of characters received by the
> terminal. Someone can easily reproduce a bug by replaying the trace
> both on xterm and nterm. I don't think term has that feature.
See term-start-output-log
- nterm a vt100 emulator, Ivan Kanis, 2009/10/15
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/15
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Ivan Kanis, 2009/10/16
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/19
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Miles Bader, 2009/10/19
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Ivan Kanis, 2009/10/20
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Ivan Kanis, 2009/10/21
- Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/21
Re: nterm a vt100 emulator, Miles Bader, 2009/10/15