Re: code coverage mode?

[Stefan Monnier]

> I like the flymake style, yet I still want to really use flymake for
> how it was intended.  (Plus I don't want to be re-running coverage
[...]
> by any means, I'm hacking stuff together here.  But if this were
> python then I'd create a subclass of flymake and use that for
> coverage, while still using the former for its normal use (syntax
> checking).

So, IIUC you'd like to be able to use flymake in two different ways at
the same time in the same buffer?  It's probably not too difficult to
do, but will require changing flymake for that.

Patches welcome,


        Stefan