Re: BASE_PURESIZE

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:39:37 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > Isn't the current definition of BASE_PURESIZE too large?
> 
> Fits quite well here (pure_size - pure_bytes_used == 79770).

What configuration is that?

Anyway, the numerical constant is not supposed to be tuned to the
largest user of pure[], that's what SYSTEM_PURESIZE_EXTRA and friends
are for.

But since Dan says he has changes in the pipe to use that up, I guess
that's okay.