[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BASE_PURESIZE
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: BASE_PURESIZE |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:16:22 -0700 (PDT) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > We could decide that we don't care too much about the --without-x
> >
> > IMHO --without-x is completely unimportant.
>
> Not sure what you mean by this statement. If you mean that wasting a
> few extra kB of memory on --without-x builds isn't important,
That's exactly what I mean.
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, (continued)
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Andreas Schwab, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Stefan Monnier, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/25
- defcustom standard-value (was: Re: BASE_PURESIZE), Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/29
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Chong Yidong, 2009/10/24
- Re: BASE_PURESIZE,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/10/23
Re: BASE_PURESIZE, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/10/23