[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t and nil in pure memory?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:55:43 -0500 |
I don't think this matters enough to bother: even if we consider GC
too slow (and I don't think so), this is only 10% of it, so even
reducing it to zero will give only a marginal speedup.
Considering how many people run Emacs, I think even a 1% speedup
in GC is worth the effort if it is not much effort.
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, (continued)
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Tom Tromey, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/23
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/24
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/24
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/11
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/12
Re: t and nil in pure memory?, A. Soare, 2009/11/20