[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t and nil in pure memory?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:56:54 -0500 |
Would it make sense to put Qt and Qnil in pure memory?
That isn't valid. The property lists of t and nil have to be writable.
We could store the property lists of t and nil in a special way. Then
they could be pure, as long as we make sure their oblist links never
need to be changed.
Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/11
Re: t and nil in pure memory?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: t and nil in pure memory?, A. Soare, 2009/11/20