Re: t and nil in pure memory?

[David Kastrup]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> If one sorts the pure symbols to the end of the obarray bucket chain
>> before dumping, they can't possibly be followed by non-pure symbols in
>> their life time since intern adds to the front of a bucket chain.
>
> Except when you call unintern, of course.
> No, I'm just not willing to go there.  Too much trouble, too little gain.

I am skeptical that we have everything in place that is required to
properly support

(unintern nil)
(unintern t)

right now.

-- 
David Kastrup