Re: Backward completions (was: Vertical completions)

[Lennart Borgman]

On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The following patch binds <backtab> to `minibuffer-complete-backward'
>
> I wish you wouldn't do that - just a wish. <backtab> is essentially S-TAB. I
> would prefer that Emacs leave TAB combinations alone, so that users and
> libraries can make use of them without stepping on standard bindings.

This is used extensively in org-mode.

> FWIW, C-v and M-v make more sense (yes, in the minibuffer too) for scrolling
> completions than do TAB and <backtab>.

Page Up/Down?