[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t and nil in pure memory?
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:18:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Colascione <address@hidden> writes:
Daniel> Ken Raeburn wrote:
>> Use Hans Boehm's GC
Daniel> Conservative GCs scare the bejesus out of me. Their chief attraction is
Daniel> that you can wedge them into a system not designed for GC and they'll
Daniel> mostly work. But there's already a precise garbage collector, and I
Daniel> don't think it's worthwhile (or safe) to get rid of it.
The Boehm GC can do precise marking of the heap.
On some platforms, Emacs already does conservative marking of the stack.
So, on these platforms, using the Boehm GC does not necessarily imply
any real change in conservatism.
Tom
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, (continued)
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/20
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Sam Steingold, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Daniel Colascione, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Tom Tromey, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/23
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/24
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/24
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/11