[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t and nil in pure memory?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:23:27 -0500 |
There are *many* ways for the user to shoot herself in the foot and make
her Emacs session completely unusable.
We won't try all, but it is useful to catch some. unintern is not
used a lot, so don't worry about the cpu time.
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, (continued)
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/16
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Daniel Colascione, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/20
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Sam Steingold, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Daniel Colascione, 2009/11/18