[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Case mapping of sharp s
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: Case mapping of sharp s |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:13:52 +0900 |
Stefan Monnier writes:
> Actually, there is a significant difference when going backward, because
> of the special encoding used for eight-bit-graphics in Emacs-22 and the
> more regular and less space-efficient encoding used for eight-bit chars
> in Emacs-23.
Premature optimization is the root of all error. Fortunately, it took
you only 3 releases to figure that out. ;-)
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, (continued)
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, grischka, 2009/11/19
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/19
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/19
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/20
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, David Kastrup, 2009/11/21
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/21
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/21
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/21
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/11/21
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/22
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Kenichi Handa, 2009/11/22
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/21
- Re: Case mapping of sharp s, Ulrich Mueller, 2009/11/20