emacs-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bzr repository ready?


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: Re: bzr repository ready?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:23:20 +0200

> From: Karl Fogel <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:29:35 -0500
> Cc: Andreas Schwab <address@hidden>,
>       Jason Earl <address@hidden>,
>       Ian Clatworthy <address@hidden>
> 
> Okay, I've spent some time yesterday and today checking over the latest
> Bzr conversion, which I obtained thusly:
> 
>   $ scp -r address@hidden:/srv/bzr/emacs emacs-bzr-repository
> 
> Below are the results.

Thanks.  My knowledge of bzr is close to zero, so please be gentle
with me ;-)

> * Spot-check a change.  [PASS]

What does it mean to "spot-check a change"?  Also, what are the
criteria for judging these "spot-checks", according to which you say
"PASS"?

>   These two changes in CVS...
> 
>      2006-01-12 05:20  jhd
> 
>       * configure.in, nt/.cvsignore, nt/COPYING, nt/ChangeLog,
>       nt/INSTALL, nt/README, nt/addpm.c, nt/addsection.c, nt/cmdproxy.c,
>       nt/config.nt, nt/configure.bat, nt/ddeclient.c, nt/emacs.rc,
>       nt/envadd.bat, nt/gmake.defs, nt/makefile.w32-in,
>       nt/multi-install-info.bat, nt/nmake.defs, nt/paths.h, nt/preprep.c,
>       nt/runemacs.c, nt/icons/emacs.ico, nt/icons/emacs21.ico,
>       nt/inc/gettext.h, nt/inc/grp.h, nt/inc/sys/socket.h
>       (XFT_JHD_BRANCH.[3,1,1,2,2,1,1,1,1,2,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2]):
> 
>       Update from HEAD
> 
>   ...and...
> 
>     2006-01-12 05:24  jhd
> 
>       * .cvsignore, AUTHORS, COPYING, ChangeLog, INSTALL.CVS,
>       Makefile.in, config.bat, config.guess, config.sub, configure,
>         [...too many files to list here, really, hundreds of them...]
> 
>   ...match this merge commit in Bazaar on the XFT_JHD_BRANCH branch:
> 
>       [...]
>       ------------------------------------------------------------
>       revno: 60734 [merge]
>       committer: Jan Djärv <address@hidden>
>       timestamp: Thu 2006-01-12 10:25:48 +0000
>       message:
>         Update from HEAD
>       [...]
> 
>   ....which is 40000 lines long, so I'm not including it all here.

Would it be a good idea to show a few lines?  Or are you only
interested in the fact that the "Update from HEAD" log was caught?
How about the list of files -- did you verify that it is identical to
the original one?

>   These three changes in CVS...
> 
>     2002-10-29 04:45  lektu
>       * nt/ChangeLog (1.74):
>       Added "(tiny change)" marker.
>     
>     2002-10-29 04:41  lektu
>       * lisp/ChangeLog (EMACS_21_1_RC.237):
>       Add "(tiny change)" markers.
>     
>     2002-10-29 04:38  lektu
>       * lisp/ChangeLog (1.4464):
>       Added "(tiny change)" marker.
>     
>    ...match these *two* changes in Bazaar:
> 
>    (on the EMACS_21_1_RC branch):
>       ------------------------------------------------------------
>       revno: 40805
>       committer: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
>       timestamp: Tue 2002-10-29 09:41:08 +0000
>       message:
>         Add "(tiny change)" markers.
>       modified:
>         lisp/ChangeLog
>       
>    (on the trunk branch):
>       ------------------------------------------------------------
>       revno: 48050
>       committer: Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>
>       timestamp: Tue 2002-10-29 09:45:19 +0000
>       message:
>         Added "(tiny change)" marker.
>       modified:
>         lisp/ChangeLog
>         nt/ChangeLog

So what does it mean -- that the conversion tries to second-guess
filesets based on log entries?





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]