[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:35:42 -0500 |
Hm, then perhaps some code became illegal when GPLv3 was released
The mere release of a new license has no such effect. If this result
occurred, it occurred when we released Emacs under GPLv3+ instead of
GPLv2+.
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, (continued)
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Jonas Bernoulli, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, David Kastrup, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/26
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/11/25
- Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Lennart Borgman, 2009/11/25
Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs, Giorgos Keramidas, 2009/11/25