[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:50:22 +0100 |
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 21:46, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
> One possibility is that the Makefile in the tarball doesn't compile the
> semantic/*/*.elc files, but the change to Makefile.in, done by Stefan
> after the tarball was made, fixes this. Dunno why the problem doesn't
> show up on GNU/Linux, though.
I don't think Makefile.in is involved in this; likely a problem with
the Windows-specific makefile.w32-in.
The problem, BTW, has surely been happening for a while on the trunk;
we just didn't notice until now.
Juanma
- Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/08
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/08
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Glenn Morris, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/11
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/11
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Giovanni Lanzani, 2009/12/09