[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer'
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:26:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
> Me too I've seen these messages with some code I've been using. Yet
> I wasn't sure how to interpret them / what to do with them. I looked
> into the elisp manual, but I didn't find anything. It would be great
> if someone could add a remark to the elisp manual and / or
> docstrings about the relation between save-excursion, set-buffer and
> with-current-buffer.
save-excursion only saves point in the current buffer, so
(save-excursion (set-buffer foo) (goto-char (point-min)))
will move point in foo and the point-saving done by save-excursion is
useless. So either you want to use
(save-current-buffer (set-buffer foo) (goto-char (point-min)))
aka
(with-current-buffer foo (goto-char (point-min)))
if moving point in foo is what you wanted, or
(with-current-buffer foo (save-excursion (goto-char (point-min))))
if you didn't want to move point in foo.
Stefan
- `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/18
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Roland Winkler, 2009/12/20
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer',
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', David Kastrup, 2009/12/21
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', martin rudalics, 2009/12/22
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/22
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', David Kastrup, 2009/12/23
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/23
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', David Kastrup, 2009/12/24
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/30
- Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer', Roland Winkler, 2009/12/24