[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strange message from "bzr pull"
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Strange message from "bzr pull" |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 16:19:05 +0100 |
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 16:05, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> After reading that, I think that the Emacswiki should recommend "bzr up",
> not "bzr pull". The main reason is that the Bazaar docs say one should
> use `update' in this configuration. Bazaar docs are far from ideal,
> but they are very clear on this issue.
In that thread, Matthew D. Fuller clearly said:
> If you want to update a checkout to catch up changes in the branch,
> you want 'update'. That 'pull', with an appropriate parent location,
> in a heavy checkout, also seems to do the same thing is sheer
> coincidence and a terribly ugly break of the model.
I think that says it all.
Juanma
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", (continued)
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Karl Fogel, 2009/12/29
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/29
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Karl Fogel, 2009/12/29
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/29
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/30
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/30
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/30
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull",
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Karl Fogel, 2009/12/31
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/31
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Stefan Monnier, 2009/12/30
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/12/31
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/29
- Re: Strange message from "bzr pull", Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/29