|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: `save-excursion' defeated by `set-buffer' |
Date: | Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:07:35 +0100 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes: > Show me a single case (in existing code) where (save-excursion > (set-buffer FOO) ...) wouldn't better be written some other way. That does not justify a bogus warning. Show me a single case where (setq a ...) (setq a ...) wouldn't be better be written some other way (with "better" meaning a completely subjective measure). Yet we don't warn about it. We don't press matters of style lightly. Or more serious, a single case where (sort xxx ...) or (nconc xxx ...) outside of a (setq xxx ...) wouldn't better be written some other way. We don't warn about those either. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |