|
From: | Jan Djärv |
Subject: | Re: bzr workflow |
Date: | Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:47:02 +0100 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) |
Óscar Fuentes skrev:
There is something that I disagree with BzrForEmacsDevs: a quickfix that requires more than one commit or that spans so long in time to warrant a merge from upstream does not qualify as a quickfix for me.
This is too simple. There have been many times in the CVS days when I tried to commit a change only to find out there was a conflict (usually ChangeLog). So I always merge from upstream before committing to upstream. So what you are saying is in fact, there are no quick fixes.
What starts out as a (presumed) quickfix often turns in to a week/month long fix. To assume that one can always beforehand descide if one is about to do a quickfix or not is also too simple minded.
Bzr feels very strange and uncomfortable. It is workable, but not smooth or elegant, just kind of icky.
Jan D.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |