[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23 Mac port
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23 Mac port |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:22:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
>>> Thanks. But then a special event such as SIGUSR1 cancels an
>>> incomplete key sequence being typed. How about doing this only when
>>> the current buffer is changed by the special event?
>> IIRC the general approach to these kinds of problems in
>> read-key-sequence is to only recompute the initial state if the current
>> key-sequence is still empty.
>> I.e. rather than check whether the special event has changed current
>> buffer, we would instead check whether the keybuf is still empty.
> But that can be wrong too. In *scratch*:
> C-c <drop .c-file> C-e
In which sense would it be wrong? What would you consider to be "right"?
Stefan
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, (continued)
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Leo, 2010/01/02
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/01/02
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Leo, 2010/01/03
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Jan Djärv, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Jan D., 2010/01/13
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/13
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/01/12
- Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Jan D., 2010/01/13
Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/03
Re: Emacs 23 Mac port, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2010/01/29