[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please.
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please. |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:38:21 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi, Giorgos,
Thanks for all the explanation!
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:37:24AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:27:24 +0000, Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi, Emacs,
> > I've been struggling with this fine distributed version control
> > system for over a week now. My trouble is that I have no mental
> > picture of what the main bits are in bzr and what the relationships
> > between them are. I don't find the bazaar documentation much help
> > in forming such a mental picture.
> > Specific problem: I have just fixed a bug in my "quickfixes" branch.
> > This involved changing a single C file and .../src/ChangeLog. I
> > attempt to merge the change into my "trunk" branch by doing this:
> > ~/emacs/emacs.bzr/quickfixes$ bzr merge
> > I get this error message:
> > bzr: ERROR: Working tree "/home/acm/emacs/emacs.bzr/quickfixes/" has
> > uncommitted changes (See bzr status).
> > When I execute bzr status, it gives me a list of ~55 allegedly modified
> > files, finishing up with:
> > pending merge tips: (use -v to see all merge revisions)
> > Jan D. 2010-01-06 [merge] Fix slowdown and wrong font choosed by
> > XSETTINGS...
> > Would somebody please tell me what I might have done to make bzr think
> > I've got 55 modified files? How might I recover from this?
> The "pending merge" message means that in the past (before you made the
> quick fix to the two files) you did:
> bzr merge
OK, that's quite likely. Am I right believing that 'bzr merge' pulls in
any changes in the current branch's parent?
> This pulled stuff from the local trunk branch, and merged it with your
> local quickfixes branch. But you have to also run "bzr commit" to
> complete the fix. You didn't at the time, so the quickfixes branch
> remains in a "the merge has locally finished but it is uncommitted"
> state.
> I think the easiest way to revert your local "quickfixes" branch to a
> known & sane state is something like:
> 1. Keep a backup of the two files you modified.
> 2. Wipe the local quickfixes branch.
> 3. Re-create the quickfixes from trunk.
> 4. Overwre the two files in the new quickfixes branch.
> 5. Use "bzr diff" to inspect the changes.
> 6. Commit them with "bzr commit".
Do I want to revert it? I don't think I do. If I just do "bzr commit"
in my .../quickfixes, that should leave it in a consistent state,
shouldn't it?
After that, I want to get my changes from .../quickfixes copied over to
.../trunk. Is 'bzr push' the way to do this?
> HTH,
It did, very much!
> Giorgos
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., (continued)
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/16
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/16
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/16
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Giorgos Keramidas, 2010/01/16
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/16
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/16
- Simple unsticking with 'bzr shelve' [was: Help me unstick ...], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/17
- Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/16
Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please.,
Alan Mackenzie <=
Re: Help me unstick my bzr, please., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/16