[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `bzr viz' slooow
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: `bzr viz' slooow |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2010 12:30:24 +0100 (CET) |
>> Maybe. However, it is quite generic and basically independent of
>> the version of bzr. In other words, it uses calls to the bzr
>> infrastructure to get the data.
>
> And why do you think that it is bzr the main culprit? Haven't you
> seen the timings about qlog, which does the same thing but much
> faster?
I'll try qlog.
> Have you forgotten about the possibility of displaying the graph at
> the same time that the data is collected, the same way gitk does?
I've suggested exactly that on the bzr-gtk mailing list meanwhile.
> Or is this about blaming bzr and make it look bad?
Not at all. However, gtk and not qt is the primary graphical
environment recommended for GNU projects, right? From a political
point of view, bzr-gtk should thus be the preferred tool...
>> Either your machine is much faster than mine, or you have `light'
>> checkout.
>
> Actually, building the graph on a lightweight checkout of a remote
> branch will require *much* more time.
OK.
Werner
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, (continued)
Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/26
Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Dan Nicolaescu, 2010/01/26
Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Ken Hori, 2010/01/27
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/27
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/27
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/01/27
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/27
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/27
- Re: `bzr viz' slooow, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/27