Re: No commit in vc?

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:

  > () Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
  > () Sun, 31 Jan 2010 10:00:37 -0500
  > 
  >    This is discouraged and poorly supported by `bzr', so at least
  >    for vc-bzr.el it makes sense.
  > 
  > Now, perhaps, but who knows if a future bzr might be improved?
  > 
  >    This said, it's OK to replace "recommend" with some other
  >    formulation, like "pending merges: you may want to commit
  >    before any further development" if that soothes you,
  > 
  > I think any forumalation is fine, in the right place.
  > However, the status message is not the right place.
  > 
  > What this thread has taught me is that for bzr, "merge" does
  > not imply "commit".  To DTRT, VC "merge" should allow for
  > this split in all backends, and (perhaps with a prefix arg)
  > do a (perhaps confirmed by y-or-n-p) commit.  That is, VC
  > "merge" should not assume backend "merge" implies "commit".

There's no VC merge for bzr.