[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Commit netiquette.
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Commit netiquette. |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:25:40 -0500 |
> Of course, people could also provide summary lines in a ChangeLog
> -- e.g., prefix a classic ChangeLog entry with a "SUMMARY:" line.
> Indeed, I'd recommend that people do this, even though it's not a
> part of the classic ChangeLog format (I do this sometimes when
> adding a single cohesive change that touches many files); it
> makes ChangeLogs easier to read and more useful.
However, the "SUMMARY:" part just wastes precious real estate of
the single line produced by "bzr log --line".
I think Miles suggestion would strip `SUMMARY:' before putting it into
a log message. Personally, I dislike this kind of behind-the-back
features.
- Re: Commit netiquette., (continued)
- Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/19
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/19
- Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Miles Bader, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Miles Bader, 2010/02/21
- Re: Commit netiquette., Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/21
- Re: Commit netiquette., Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette.,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/20
- Re: Commit netiquette., Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette., David Kastrup, 2010/02/23
- Re: Commit netiquette., Juanma Barranquero, 2010/02/23
Re: Commit netiquette., Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/18
Re: Commit netiquette., Miles Bader, 2010/02/19
Re: Commit netiquette., Mark A. Hershberger, 2010/02/18