[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:28:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) |
Leo <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2010-02-25 15:26 +0000, David Reitter wrote:
>> The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30
>> MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're
>> talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository
>> (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when
>> checking out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.)
>
> And if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again.
The most terse way of achieving what he did is
bzr add
bzr commit -m "tons of things"
(from a bound branch, aka checkout)
Howevere, the committer didn't detailed what he did to commit all that
stuff and this is speculation. Needless to say, one ought to check
before committing. In this case, a simple `bzr diff' would do. Or just
use VC-dir.
- emacs-w3m?, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2010/02/24
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/24
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/24
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Leo, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, bob, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Roehler, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27