[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Andreas Roehler |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Feb 2010 19:20:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081227) |
Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> David Reitter writes:
>
> > What happens if somebody checked in code for which permission
> > hasn't been obtained and can't be obtained? Suppose the
> > copyright-holder requests removal.
>
> Then you think (and do) the unthinkable, of course. It would be very
> good luck if that's all they want, though -- that scenario involves
> much bigger problems.
>
>
>
>
>
>
My emacs-w3m files show "either version 2, or (at your option) any later
version."
>From there it shouldn't arise any difficulty. It's just to update the version.
Andreas
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Richard Stallman, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/25
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Andreas Roehler <=