[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:03:41 -0500 |
Adding a file whose parent directory is not versioned will implicitly
add the parent, and so on up to the root. This means you should never
need to explicitly add a directory, they ll just get added when you
add a file in the directory.
The second sentence explains the rationale behind this feature. But
in this case, Bob mistakenly added a single file, and that ended up
adding the whole directory. By contrast, "cvs add" is explicitly
non-recursive, AFAIR.
The feature is clearly a convenience in the case where you are not
making a mistake. Should `bzr add' ask for confirmation before doing
this?
- Re: emacs-w3m?, (continued)
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, David Reitter, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/02/28
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/02/27
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Andreas Schwab, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Robert J. Chassell, 2010/02/26
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/02/26