[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m? |
Date: |
Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:13:24 +0200 |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden>, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:06:44 +0900
>
> Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> > Probably doesn't make any difference: he would have typed "bzr add ."
> > rather than "bzr add" and the result would have been the same.
>
> No, I think that's wrong.
>
> I don't really know why he typed "bzr add" (i.e., whether by sheer
> accident, or in confusion about what it did)
For the record: Bob says that there's only one instance of the "add"
command in his .bzr.log, and it's for a single specific (though
non-existent) file. How the whole directory got added is still
largely a mystery.
- Re: emacs-w3m?, Miles Bader, 2010/03/01
- Re: emacs-w3m?,
Eli Zaretskii <=