[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Integrating package.el
From: |
Phil Hagelberg |
Subject: |
Re: Integrating package.el |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 21:42:01 -0800 |
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Tom Tromey <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Ted> I don't think that's ideal either. I'd rather use the authors' version
> Ted> and then allow an override by the repository maintainer.
>
> Yes. My policy for ELPA has just been to require sanity from the
> maintainers. In general I don't upload a package that is broken, and I
> require changes to go upstream before uploading. My reasoning was that
> a little sanity is not very hard to achieve (though in real life there
> are a some recalcitrant types out there) and it was better to try to
> distribute the work instead of taking it all on myself.
It should be noted that if package.el is included in Emacs, it will
provide a lot more incentive for package authors to provide proper
metadata and ensure that their code works with package.el themselves.
So I don't think this needs to be worried about.
-Phil
- Re: Integrating package.el, (continued)
Re: Integrating package.el, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/01
Re: Integrating package.el, Jonas Bernoulli, 2010/03/01
Re: Integrating package.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/02
Re: Integrating package.el, Tom Tromey, 2010/03/03
Re: Integrating package.el,
Phil Hagelberg <=
Re: Integrating package.el, Davis Herring, 2010/03/02
Re: Integrating package.el, Phil Hagelberg, 2010/03/04
Re: Integrating package.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/04
Re: Integrating package.el, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/04
Re: Integrating package.el, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/04