[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integer overflow
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: integer overflow |
|
Date: |
Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:55:25 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
> Indeed, I thought about it as a pure bug-fix, but it needs to be added
> to the NEWS. Can you do that and update the doc accordingly?
I don't really understand it. In a 32-bit Emacs:
(1+ 536870911) -536870912
(+ 2 536870911) -536870911
(1+ 536870912) 536870913.0
(1+ 4294967295) overflow
(1+ 4294967295.0) 4294967296.0
Can you summarize how it's supposed to work?
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Glenn Morris, 2010/03/02
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Johan Bockgård, 2010/03/05
- integer overflow [was Re: Next pretest, and branching plans], Glenn Morris, 2010/03/05
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/05
- Re: integer overflow,
Glenn Morris <=
- Re: integer overflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/05
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Davis Herring, 2010/03/06
- RE: integer overflow, Drew Adams, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Jay Belanger, 2010/03/07