[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:32:30 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:41:53 -0600 Ted Zlatanov <address@hidden> wrote:
TZ> On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:04:40 -0500 Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
RS> The second that "librep" might be an easier starting point for migrating
RS> the Lisp engine. After all, it was designed to be like Emacs Lisp.
RS> If it only supports something like Emacs Lisp then it is not much of
RS> an advance. Guile supports Scheme and Javascript as well as Emacs Lisp.
TZ> It also supports multithreading, which IMHO is a big deal as well,
TZ> perhaps more important than bignums.
By "it" I meant Guile, not librep. librep does not (based on the
manual) support multithreading.
Ted
- Re: integer overflow, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Davis Herring, 2010/03/06
- RE: integer overflow, Drew Adams, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Jay Belanger, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Chad Brown, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Johan Bockgård, 2010/03/07