[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next pretest, and branching plans
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Next pretest, and branching plans |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:06:47 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:30:28 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > Would it make sense to create a 'make package-install' target that omits
> > these things (if there is other stuff besides the shortcut, that is more
> > intended for a real installation rather than packaging)? When I am packaging
> > I don't want the shortcut created.
>
> To me at least, the name "package-install" would not be helpful.
> Something like "install_files_only" would sound more meaningful (or
> "install_for_packaging", or ...).
I suggest "dist", like in the top-level Makefile.in. There's no need
for this target without actually producing the binary zip file, so it
should run the makedist.bat script as part of its job.
Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Christoph, 2010/03/13
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/13
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/13
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/13
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Christoph, 2010/03/13
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/13
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/14
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Christoph, 2010/03/16
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/17
- Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/17