[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is it a mistake to define dired-omit-mode as a minor mode?
From: |
Tassilo Horn |
Subject: |
Re: Is it a mistake to define dired-omit-mode as a minor mode? |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 07:52:44 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.1 (Linux/2.6.33-gentoo; KDE/4.4.1; x86_64; ; ) |
On Thursday 18 March 2010 22:48:58 Lennart Borgman wrote:
> > dired-omit-mode is an interactive compiled Lisp function in `dired-
> > x.el'.
> >
> > (dired-omit-mode &optional ARG)
> >
> > Toggle Dired-Omit mode.
> > With numeric ARG, enable Dired-Omit mode if ARG is positive,
> > disable otherwise. Enabling and disabling is buffer-local.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > If enabled, "uninteresting" files are not listed.
> > Uninteresting files are those whose filenames match regexp
> > `dired-omit- files', plus those ending with extensions in
> > `dired-omit-extensions'.
>
> Is dired-omit-mode and cousine options something we forgot to
> autoload, or?
It's in dired-x.el. I don't know if there should be autoloads for such
addons.
Bye,
Tassilo