[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: next emacs version?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: next emacs version? |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 07:58:10 -0700 |
> > It's a transient problem that is not worth worrying about. Users who
> > build from development sources will update and rebuild soon anyway.
>
> Right. And because of this, I think testing with version< against the
> last officially released version would be good enough.
Actually, this is the test I think is appropriate, where N is the _next_
official release (e.g. "23.2" in the current case):
(if (or (not (fboundp 'version<))
(version< emacs-version N))
OLD
NEW)
24.0.50.1, 23.2, and later will pick up NEW.
23.1 and anything older will pick up OLD.
Testing with `version<' against the _last_ official release won't help, I think.
Maybe you meant `version<='? E.g.:
(if (version<= emacs-version "23.1") OLD NEW)
- Re: next emacs version?, (continued)
- Re: next emacs version?, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/22
- Re: next emacs version?, Miles Bader, 2010/03/23
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/23
- Re: next emacs version?, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/19
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- RE: next emacs version?, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: next emacs version?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/21