Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m

[Lennart Borgman]

On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Deniz Dogan <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2010/3/28 Lennart Borgman <address@hidden>:
>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>    > And C-z is currently `suspend-frame' in Emacs.
>>>
>>> On a terminal, C-z suspends Emacs and is an important command,.
>>
>> Thanks, I forgot. But is there any good reason to use C-z also on
>> window systems? Why not let it be undo there since that is the most
>> common use (as far as I know)?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Emacs users on Windows systems may like the fact that the bindings are
> consistent, so that they can use the same .emacs independent of the
> operating system.


Yes, of course. But what do you mean? Is that in an argument against
using C-z for `undo´? Is there any kind of conflict?

If so then perhaps it could be resolved by having one set of key
bindings for terminal users and one for GUI users? (An idea we have
been discussing before.)