[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Next pretest
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: Next pretest |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:48:22 +0200 |
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Drew Adams <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >> I would like to make the next pretest release (23.1.95) this coming
>> >> Friday, the 2nd of April. Let me know if there are no
>> >> objections, or any problems that you'd like to see addressed.
>> >
>> > How about a Windows binary?
>>
>> I will be away. However I could perhaps upload something now to my
>> site instead. How about that?
>
> Every little bit helps, of course. Thanks, Lennart.
>
...
> And pretest binaries should correspond to the pretest source code exactly.
> Otherwise, we can be comparing apples and oranges (which can mean confusion
> and
> more work for everyone involved).
Thanks. I am including a file with something like this now:
;; bzr checkout info for Emacs unpatched version
(defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-revision-id
"address@hidden")
(defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-revno 99712)
(defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-date "2010-03-21 12:57:49 +0100")
(defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-branch-nick "trunk")
I suggested that should be recommended in the build process and
included in bug reports, but I got no responce.
> And `report-emacs-bug' should correctly address the pretest mailing list (that
> didn't happen the last time you made a binary available informally for pretest
> testing).
I have forgotten. Was I using the wrong branch, or?
Re: Next pretest, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/28
Re: Next pretest, Glenn Morris, 2010/03/29