|
| From: | Richard Stallman |
| Subject: | Re: Guile in Emacs |
| Date: | Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:33:33 -0400 |
I do not understand the point about documentation though. Why would it
be harder to document a common lisp based emacs than a scheme based
emacs?
Common Lisp has sooo much to document. The Emacs Lisp Manual would
get a lot bigger if it had to include the specs of so many functions.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |