Re: VC and bzr.

[Dan Nicolaescu]

"Davis Herring" <address@hidden> writes:

>>> (not that it was ever a documented feature, I suppose); perhaps we
> should put it back, or
> [...]
>> Can you please file a bug with a step by step description of the problem?
>
> Is it really a bug? 

It's hard to say without being able to try it...

>  I thought it was just an accidental feature of C-x v
> v that no longer existed.  The docstring doesn't mention the case where
> Emacs' idea of the file's status is out of date.