[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd? |
Date: |
Sat, 01 May 2010 21:42:40 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:54:48 -0400
>
> Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> > > Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:11:31 -0400
> > >
> > > Besides src/s/gnu.h only w32 does not define POSIX_SIGNALS...
> >
> > All these signals mean nothing to w32. AFAICS, we could simply define
> > empty no-ops for the functions Emacs uses under POSIX_SIGNALS, and
> > then w32 would not need any special conditions in these quarters.
> >
> > Let me know if you want me to make this happen. (I guess it's only
> > worthwhile when the Hurd issue gets cleared.)
>
> Please do that.
Done with revno 100106.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: POSIX_SIGNALS support for GNU/Hurd?,
Eli Zaretskii <=