Re: which-function => DEFUN?

[Lennart Borgman]

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 16:39, Lennart Borgman
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>        ;; Check if we are at the beginning of the function already
>>        (unless (eobp) (forward-char))
>
> Yes, nice catch. Thanks.
>
>>        (beginning-of-defun)
>>        (when (< here (point)) (beginning-of-defun))
>
> What does this protect against?

We might have stepped into the next function.

> And, why did you go for (let ((here (point))) ...) instead of
> `save-excursion'? Efficiency?

Efficiency. And actually readability.

>    Juanma
>