[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil
From: |
Davis Herring |
Subject: |
Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil |
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2010 11:30:25 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5_4.10.lanl1 |
> Could we change the behavior of delete-file so that it defaults to
> buffer-file-name if non-nil, otherwise the current directory, if
> called interactively?
Doesn't it already do that? M-x delete-file RET does attempt to delete
the current buffer's file or its directory if it has no file. Personally,
I find this default sort of dangerous, although at least C-x C-w often
fixes it.
Davis
--
This product is sold by volume, not by mass. If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.
- delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Deniz Dogan, 2010/05/15
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil,
Davis Herring <=
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Deniz Dogan, 2010/05/15
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Richard Stallman, 2010/05/16
- RE: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Drew Adams, 2010/05/16
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Juri Linkov, 2010/05/16
- RE: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Drew Adams, 2010/05/16
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Stefan Monnier, 2010/05/17
- RE: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Drew Adams, 2010/05/17
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Deniz Dogan, 2010/05/17
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Juri Linkov, 2010/05/17
- Re: delete-file default to buffer-file-name if non-nil, Juri Linkov, 2010/05/18